![]()
Manure and effluent present potential odour risks
Ammonia
|
Agriculture main source (90%) of ammonia emissions in UK | |
|
Current estimates (2006) are 315 x 103 t/year, of which 288 x 103 t/year from agriculture. | |
|
Most ammonia losses occur after spreading livestock waste, 30% of the national total | |
|
28% of national total is derived from livestock housing | |
|
Losses from grazing, 10% of national total, from storage 5% of national total | |
|
Remainder from nitrogen, fertilizer and crops | |
|
Approx. 50% of N deposited in atmosphere in the UK is as ammonia, the remainder is as oxides of nitrate from combustion, transport and industry | |
|
Trend is moving in the right direction although it has slowed in recent years. The emission target set for 2010 under the UNECE Gothenburg Protocol and EU target is 297 x 103 t/year |
Source: AEA Energy and Environment from Defra website
Why is ammonia a problem ?
|
Soil acidification | |
|
Nutrient enrichment (eutrophication) of non agricultural soils and water | |
|
Ammonia is very soluble in water so readily deposited in rainfall (see above diagram) | |
|
Loss of valuable farm nutrient resource |
Ammonia release:
|
Urine of mammals contains urea, poultry excreta contains uric acid, both can both may be broken down to release ammonia to the atmosphere | |
|
Urea is hydrolyzed by the enzyme urease to ammonium carbonate, this disassociates rapidly in water to produce OH ions: NH3+H2O = NH4++OH | |
|
At this pH ammonia is predominantly in NH3 (molecular) form, and will diffuse into the air as long as the air concentration is lower than in the aqueous solution (urine etc.) | |
|
Uric acid is hydrolyzed first to urea, by bacterial enzymes, the produced urea then behaves as outlined above | |
|
If poultry excreta is kept dry (< 30% moisture), then bacterial activity is inhibited, hence uric acid hydrolysis is inhibited and ammonia production is halted |
Reducing ammonia losses
Livestock:
|
Reduce N excreted by animals by matching dietary inputs to nutritional requirements (amino acid inputs in pigs and poultry are particularly high) | |
|
Most animal housing is naturally ventilated and it is not possible to remove ammonia from air as it leaves the building. Costs of fitting ammonia filter systems exceed the profit margins per animal place |

Naturally ventilated livestock housing presents a pleasant environment for the animals but allow gasses directly into the atmosphere. The alternatives are both impractical and expensive
Storage:
|
50% of all animal excreta stored as solids (FYM) | |
|
No real successful method of reducing ammonia emissions | |
|
Slurry in above ground or underground tanks with cover reduce emissions by around 80% but risk of explosion etc. | |
|
Only 20% of cattle slurry and 40% of pig slurry in UK stored in tanks | |
|
Remainder stored in weeping wall or lagoons (open topped) |

It is virtually impossible to keep animal wastes completely 'encased' and out of sight
Spreading:
|
Injection of ammonia directly into soil, minimizing contact with air, therefore reducing diffusion | |
|
50% of animal waste produced in UK cannot be injected, (solid FYM) | |
|
Rapidly incorporating manure or slurry by ploughing directly after spreading: |

Source: Adapted from MAFF, Animal Manure Practice Survey (1997)
|
20 - 40% of UK soils are too shallow or stony for injection | |
|
Injection will increase nutrient loss by other methods, i.e. leaching |
Pause for thought.....State 2 other benefits of incorporating manures and slurries rapidly following spreading.
Other:
|
There is little scope for reducing ammonia diffusion from grazing | |
|
Ammonia losses from fertilizer spreading are significant (13% of total agricultural emissions) there are few methods of reducing them owing to: | |
|
Majority of N fertilizer used in the UK is ammonium nitrate and only 1-2% of the N is lost as ammonia | |
|
Ammonia loss from urea (10% of fertilizer N use) is much greater at c15% of N applied | |
|
Reducing ammonia losses, therefore requires replacement of urea with (more expensive) ammonium nitrate |
For more information on Ammonia in the UK CLICK HERE
______________________________
Greenhouse Gasses
Principal Greenhouse gasses:
|
Carbon dioxide | |
|
Methane | |
|
Nitrous oxide | |
|
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC's) |

Agriculture cannot be held entirely responsible for greenhouse gas emissions
Agricultural contribution (taking CO2 as a base):
|
Nitrous oxide is 310 times, and methane is 21 times, more potent than carbon dioxide in terms of radiative forcing over a 100 year period | |
|
CFC's rarely used in agriculture, except in refrigeration, but widely used in food industry | |
|
UK agriculture produces 38% of total methane, 66% of nitrous oxide and 1% of carbon dioxide in UK |
Methane:
|
Atmospheric methane is increasing at the rate of 30 - 40 Tg/year | |
|
Global emission of methane is estimated to be 540 Tg/year | |
|
Of this, 70 - 100 Tg/year from enteric fermentation from livestock and 35 Tg/year from animal wastes |
Major contributions global methane levels are:
|
Biogenic sources, eg. peat bogs & tundra - 25% | |
|
Rice paddies - 20% |

Left: 'bogland'. Right: Rice paddy, both contribute to greenhouse gas emissions
|
Enteric fermentation (mainly ruminants) - 15 - 20% | |
|
Landfill & coalmines - 8 - 10% | |
|
In the UK agriculture produces 38% of all UK methane emissions (the majority of which is enteric fermentation) with landfill sites being the largest emitter at 40% |

Source: AEA Energy and Environment from Defra website.
Reduction of methane output:
|
Very little can be done at present | |
|
Reduce number of cattle, therefore enteric fermentation | |
|
Improve cattle production efficiency | |
|
Above two factors already underway by default. i.e. milk quota's, BSE, loss of farm incomes etc. (weeks 1 & 2) | |
|
Some research work into methane reducing feed additives, but at present require withdrawal times so cannot be used on dairy cattle |
Nitrogen oxides:
|
Nitrous oxide (N2O) - contributes to global warming. It is emitted from the soil and emission increases with N inputs. The majority of nitrous oxide emissions in the UK is directly from soil - 63%. | |
|
Nitric oxide (NO) - contributes to acid deposition in soil, and formation of ozone in lower atmosphere. Emitted from soil in proportion to N inputs | |
|
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) - very reactive, contributes to acid deposition, small amount emitted from soil, but most absorbed by crop canopy, soil generally ignored as a source of this gas | |
|
Others, e.g. (N2O5) - usually present in the air and for these purposes can be ignored |

Source: AEA Energy and Environment from Defra website.
Reducing nitrous oxide emissions:
|
Reduce mineral N content of the soil by: | |
|
Analysis of soil from previous crop, manure applications, and soil organic matter before deciding on fertilizer policy | |
|
Timing of N applications to when crop has highest uptake potential | |
|
Timing of incorporation of organic manure and crop residues to avoid incorporating when soils are poorly aerated |
Carbon dioxide:
|
Agriculture only produces 1% of UK's total CO2 emissions | |
|
Road transport 22% | |
|
Residential homes 15% | |
|
Energy Industries 39% |
Pause for thought..........In wetland areas is there a tradeoff between increased biodiversity and methane emissions?
______________________________
Farm odours (Statistics: 1987 - 1990)
Sources of farm odours:
Complaints of odour from agricultural sources compiled and summarized by Environmental Health Departments | |
|
Manure and slurry spreading - 44% | |
|
Livestock buildings - 25% | |
|
Manure and slurry stores - 21% | |
|
Pig farms highest number of complaints - 47% | |
|
Poultry units - 25% | |
|
Cattle - 22% |
Dilution of farm odours:
|
Depends on strength and source of odour and prevailing wind direction |

|
There are no definitive or statutory criteria linking the frequency and concentration of odours to the occurrence of a nuisance. Guidelines have been set for other countries and industries: | |
|
Suburban areas - for no more than 2% of hours should average odour concentration exceed 5 OU/m3 | |
|
Rural areas - for no more than 2% of hours should average odour concentration exceed 10 OU/m3 | |
|
OU = Odour unit as measured by olfactomotry |
Pause for thought......Should people who move from the town to the country, be expected to tolerate odours from livestock units, on the basis that the farm was there first?
Back to Farm Pollution and Waste
![]()